Orientation
I’m Matthew Tripp Zejda. My work examines reality, knowledge, consciousness, causation, and how we live. I bring these questions together because the answers affect one another. What we think reality is shapes how we understand ourselves, our choices, and our responsibilities to one another.
This site brings together my books, research papers, explanations, and supporting material. You can follow a complete argument through a book or begin with a particular question and explore its connections.
Where to begin
I recommend beginning with Existential Logicism: A Logic-Based Tool for Navigating Reality. It develops the seven pillars through continuous explanation, examples, and their consequences for everyday life.
The companion A Logic-Based Engine for Navigating Reality includes the reading text together with formal definitions, assumptions, theorems, and proofs. Choose the Tool for the uninterrupted reading experience, or the Engine to examine the formal arguments alongside the explanation.
You do not have to read both before continuing. They offer different ways to follow the EL argument. The other books take that work into connected questions, and you can choose the one that addresses what brought you here.
How the connected works differ
Existential Logicism supplies the method and source arguments. The books below develop the integrated account, its religious applications, and the proposed physical framework. They connect without becoming interchangeable.
Existential Ground
The Undeniable Foundation Beneath Reality, Time, God, and Life
In Existential Ground, I follow the shared argument beneath questions about knowledge, nothingness, infinity, time, causation, mind, and God, then carry it into agency, fear, love, and purpose. The twenty chapters develop the explanation; four appendices provide formal arguments, terminology, conclusions and open questions, and the Explanatory Cartography Atlas.
Begin here for the integrated account and its human consequences. You can read it without first completing the earlier books.
Explore Existential GroundFinite Mind, Finite God
I apply EL to what a finite mind can mean by God, revelation, personhood, and ultimacy. The argument follows interpretation, fairness, belief, and religious authority rather than treating the God question as a demand to choose a side before its terms are clear.
Begin here for the sustained religion and ultimacy inquiry, including the Human Interface Thesis, Fairness Clause, Salvation Paradox, and Finite God Trap.
Explore Finite Mind, Finite GodResolution State Interface: Introduction to Universal Relativity
I develop RSI as a proposed deterministic physical framework. The account begins with a declared system, its participating identities, carrier geometry, and energy ledger, then asks what can persist, what changes, and how the result can be compared with measurement.
Begin here for the physical proposal, its core equations, and the calculations and tests through which it has to earn support.
Explore Introduction to Universal RelativityClosure Cartography and The Annular Branch
I investigate the dark-matter problem through a proposed finite closure-support terrain and its observational readouts. The annular branch asks whether a shared support account can carry from regular-disc galaxy rotation into weak lensing rather than adding an independent structure for each measurement.
Begin here for that physical application. This is distinct from Explanatory Cartography, the method in Existential Ground for examining what an explanation addresses, what supports it, and where it overreaches.
Explore Closure Cartography and The Annular BranchThe logical argument constrains the physical proposal; it does not stand in for a calculation or an experiment. RSI and Closure Cartography retain their own mathematical and empirical responsibilities. A successful physical application also does not establish every philosophical claim merely because the work is connected.
Begin with a question
A particular question can be a useful entrance. These articles let you begin there, then follow the source and related arguments rather than treating one conclusion as the whole system.
- What can survive doubt, and how can different minds know a shared world?
- Begin with the Epistemic Refutation Paradox for the occurrence no denial can remove. Continue to Tripp’s Prison for finite access and the constructive account of shared knowledge. The occurrence result and the further conditions for shared warrant remain distinct.
- What are time, the past, and the future?
- Time, Chronology, and the Persistent Present distinguishes the order and pacing of change from the picture of moments stored in a temporal container. Follow its source connections for the account of records, continuity, and present actuality.
- How can a caused choice still matter?
- Caused Agency and Responsibility follows deliberation, learning, self-control, and answerability without requiring an uncaused chooser. The question is how the person acts within the causal account, not how to remove the person from it.
- What does a God claim actually claim?
- The Bad Frame begins by distinguishing the meanings that the God/no-God debate often moves between. It leads into the finite-mind, revelation, and ultimacy arguments developed in Finite Mind, Finite God.
- How does the argument connect to physics?
- RSI as the Physical Bridge explains the move from coherence constraints to a proposed physical account. Use the RSI book for the larger framework and the equation reference for the meanings and conditions attached to its symbols.
How to use this site
Projects
The project groupings distinguish Existential Logicism, Existential Ground, Finite Mind, Finite God, RSI / Universal Relativity, and Closure Cartography. For connected introductions, the Existential Logicism project and Existential Ground project gather their publications and concepts. The book routes above take you directly to each work.
Books and Papers
Each publication has its own page with a description, edition information, and available reading, downloading, or purchasing options. This is the place to choose a particular book or paper.
Project-specific concepts and proofs
The concept groups belong to their projects: EL’s pillars, Existential Ground’s concepts, the Finite Mind, Finite God arguments, and RSI’s concepts and equations. Use them to follow an individual idea in its own context. A shared argument can connect several books without becoming several competing copies of the same proof.
The Citation and Reference Index brings the lookup routes together. It points to the definitions, notation, arguments, and source locations; the substantive explanation remains on its own page or in the book.
Find a definition, argument, or source
- Terms and aliases
- Look up a word or familiar abbreviation, then follow its source-specific entry. The same word can do different work in different arguments. Its definition belongs with the source that uses it.
- Symbols and equations
- Find the notation and RSI equation routes. Read the variable definitions and conditions with the formula. A shared letter is not a guarantee of a shared quantity.
- Arguments and proofs
- Follow a named argument to its explanation and formal treatment. Keep its premises and conclusion together. The index supplies a route to the argument, not a substitute for reading it.
- Maps and reading routes
- Find connected explanations and precise book locations. In Existential Ground, Chapter 19 develops Explanatory Cartography; Appendix A supplies formal arguments, B the glossary and notation, C conclusions and open questions, and D the atlas.
- Publication citations and webpage citations
- Cite the source you used. The index supplies APA, Chicago Author-Date, and BibTeX entries. A book, a repository version, and a webpage are different sources; include the relevant chapter, section, theorem, or page when referring to a specific passage.
- Outside sources
- Find the separately organized dictionary, philosophical-reference, physics-reference, and original-research entries. The books and individual articles provide the references attached to their particular discussions.
You can also use your browser’s Find in page command to locate a term or title within the index. The headings and entries can also be read directly on the page.
Read the reasons
I’m asking you to examine the reasoning, not accept a conclusion because my name is attached to it. Follow the definitions, look at what each argument requires, and distinguish what it establishes from what still needs explanation or evidence.
You don’t need to learn every term before you begin. Start with the explanation, follow the connections, and return to the reference material when you need it.

